Diagnostic Performance of Computed and Digital Radiography in Fracture Identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
X-ray Imaging, Medical Diagnostics, Bone Fracture DetectionAbstract
The x-ray imaging aspect is efficient and effective with little cost involved, which makes it common to be used in many sectors particularly in medical diagnostics. Its quality to pass through body tissues enables it to have clean and non-invasive imaging into the internal body organs and structures. Since it is a vital technology, its evolution became very fast so that today sophisticated X-ray detectors and associated imaging systems have been designed. This research look at two forms of X-Ray imaging devices which are currently being applied in hospitals located within the Kirkuk City in the Kirkuk hospital: Computed Radiography (CR) and Digital Radiography (DR). The study compares the strengths and the weaknesses of the two systems regarding the quality of images produced and performance. A group of bone fracture involvements was diagnosed with the aid of the two technologies. The findings indicated that Digital Radiography (DR) would have been more popularly preferred as it has faster imaging, high quality image production, reduced doses of radiation used and minimum maintenance. The latter features make DR systems more suitable in the contemporary medical environment, where the ability to be fast, accurate, and reliable is essential. In addition, the paper shows the wider applications of higher level of X-ray technology where bone fractures are detected within different areas of the human body which were taken from real cases in the hospital. It also determined that the quality of the pictures taken using CR tend to be less clear when compared to the use of DR
References
[1] Röntgen, W.C., 1945. On a new kind of rays. Radiology, 45(5), pp.428-435.
[2] Stöhr, J. and Scherz, A., 2015. Creation of x-ray transparency of matter by stimulated elastic
forward scattering. Physical review letters, 115(10), p.107402.
[3] Russo, P. ed., 2017. Handbook of X-ray imaging: physics and technology. CRC press.
[4] Vinogradov, A.P., Shishkov, V.Y., Doronin, I.V., Andrianov, E.S., Pukhov, A.A. and Lisyansky,
A.A., 2021. Quantum theory of Rayleigh scattering. Optics Express, 29(2), pp.2501-2520.
[5] Zhou, Y., Chen, J., Bakr, O.M. and Mohammed, O.F., 2021. Metal halide perovskites for X-ray
imaging scintillators and detectors. ACS energy letters, 6(2), pp.739-768.
[6] Nikl, M. and Yoshikawa, A., 2015. Recent R&D trends in inorganic single‐crystal scintillator
materials for radiation detection. Advanced Optical Materials, 3(4), pp.463-481.
[7] Cervantes, G.A., 2016. The basics of x-rays. Technical Fundamentals of Radiology and CT, pp.1-
1.
[8] Joshi, D. and Singh, T.P., 2020. A survey of fracture detection techniques in bone X-ray images.
Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(6), pp.4475-4517.
[9] Myint, W.W., Tun, K.S., Tun, H.M. and Myint, H., 2018. Analysis on leg bone fracture detection
and classification using X-ray images. Machine Learning Research, 3(3), pp.49-59.
[10] Behling, R., 2021. Modern diagnostic x-ray sources: technology, manufacturing, reliability. CRC
Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits




