Factors Influencing Mergers and Closures in American International Broadcasting (1990- 2025)
Keywords:
governance, editorial independenceAbstract
This research aims to analyze the dynamics of mergers, restructuring, and closures in the US International Broadcasting (USIB) sector from 1990 to 2025. USIB is a vital tool for US public diplomacy and foreign policy, encompassing established institutions such as Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). The significance of the research lies in the fact that these processes are not merely administrative adjustments, but rather reflect profound shifts in US foreign policy priorities, resource allocation strategies, and responses to the changing global media landscape. Historically, American international broadcasting has witnessed repeated debates and reforms, driven by perceptions of inefficiency or duplication, such as the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2017. This research specifically examines the causes, processes, and outcomes of mergers and closures affecting major American international broadcasting entities (VOA, RFE/RL, RFA, MBN) from the end of the Cold War to the present(including the events of 2025). The research seeks to analyze how political, economic, strategic, and technological factors drove these changes and assess their impact on governance, editorial independence, and overall effectiveness.References
1. Broadcasting Board of Governors. (2012). *Impact through innovation and integration: BBG
strategic plan 2012-2016.
2. Department of State, Office of Inspector General. (2013, January). Inspection of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (ISP-IB-13-07).
3. Department of State, Office of Inspector General. (2020, December). Targeted inspection of
the U.S. Agency for Global Media: Journalistic standards and principles (ISP-IB-21-06).
4. Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
5. Congressional Research Service. (2021). U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM):
Background and issues for Congress (Report No. R46968).
6. Scribbr. (2022, July 12). Research objectives. Scribbr. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
7. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. (n.d.). Our history.
8. Kenneth L. Hacker, (2016). Toward a Model of Strategic Influence, International
Broadcasting, and Global Engagement. Media and Communication, Volume 4, Issue 2 range.
Pages 69- 91 .
9. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013, January). Broadcasting Board of Governors:
Additional steps needed to address overlap in international broadcasting (GAO-13-172).
10. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs..
11. Price, M. E., & Stremlau, N. (2005). Public diplomacy and the transformation of international
broadcasting. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 23(1), 67-88..
12. United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-236, 108 Stat. 432
(1994).
13. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Pub. L. No. 114-328, § 1288, 130
Stat. 2548-54 (2016).
14. William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Pub.
L. No. 116-283, § 1299Q, 134 Stat. 3388, 4020-27 (2021)..
15. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. (2023, May 3). Testimony on U.S. international
broadcasting and public diplomacy [Testimony of A. Bennett].
16. U.S. House Committee on Appropriations. (2025, March 21). Lawmakers speak out about
dismantling the U.S. Agency for Global Media.
17. USAGM Watch. (n.d.). 80 years of VOA: Different names of the Voice of America.
18. Voice of America (VOA).(2017).VOA Through the Years,.
19. Congress.gov (2021) U.S. Agency for Global Media: Background, Governance, and Issues for
Congress, Foreign Affairs, an report.
20.USAGM Watch. (n.d.). 80 years of VOA: Different names of the Voice of America.
21. Congressional Research Service (2009)U.S. Public Diplomacy: Background and Current
Issues .
22. Wimbush, S. E., & Portale, E. M. (2015). Reassessing U.S. international broadcasting [Final
report].
23.Congressional Research Service. (2021). U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM):
Background and issues for Congress (Report No. R46968). U.S. Government Publishing
Office.
24.Heritage Foundation. (2021). How to reinvigorate U.S. public diplomacy? .
25.Kim, Y. (2025, March 21). Lawmakers speak out about dismantling the U.S. Agency for Global
Media. U.S. House of Representatives.
26.Price, M. E., & Stremlau, N. (2005). Public diplomacy and the transformation of international
broadcasting. Research Gate.
27. Park, S. (2020). The role of international broadcasting in public diplomacy: A case study of
the Korean experience. Korean Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 203-225.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits
