Using Visuals and Manipulative for Supporting ELS

Main Article Content

Ali Ghafil Harbi

Abstract

One effective way to support English Language Learners (ELLs) is through the use of visuals and manipulatives in the classroom. Visual aids can play a significant role in helping ELLs comprehend and retain new information, as they provide concrete and relatable illustrations of abstract concepts. Meanwhile, manipulatives, such as flashcards, objects, or interactive games, offer a hands-on approach that can enhance ELLs' engagement and understanding of language and content. Visuals, including posters, charts, diagrams, and multimedia resources, provide ELLs with a visual representation of the language being taught. This can be particularly beneficial when introducing vocabulary, grammar concepts, or explaining complex instructions. Using visual aids not only makes the content more comprehensible but also creates a more inclusive learning environment, accommodating various learning styles and linguistic abilities. Similarly, incorporating manipulatives into language learning can make abstract language concepts more tangible and understandable for ELLs. For instance, using flashcards with words and corresponding images can help build associations between the two, aiding in vocabulary acquisition. Interactive games and activities provide opportunities for ELLs to practice language in a fun and engaging manner, allowing them to internalize language patterns and structures more effectively. In conclusion, utilizing visuals and manipulatives in the classroom can greatly support ELLs in their language acquisition journey. By making use of these tools, educators can create a more immersive and interactive learning experience that caters to the diverse needs of ELLs, ultimately fostering a more supportive and effective language learning environment

Article Details

How to Cite
Ali Ghafil Harbi. (2024). Using Visuals and Manipulative for Supporting ELS. The Peerian Journal, 27, 154–163. Retrieved from https://peerianjournal.com/index.php/tpj/article/view/767
Section
Articles

References

Baratta, A. and S. Jones. 2008. Using film to introduce and develop academic writing skills

among UK undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Enquiry 8 (2): 15–37.

Beck, I. L., M. G. McKeown, and L. Kucan. 2002. Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary

instruction. New York: Guilford.

Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain.

White Plains, NY: Longman.

Brumberger, E. 2011. Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial

learner. Journal of Visual Literacy 30 (1): 19–47.

Bruner, J. S. 1975. From communication to language: A psychological perspective.

Cognition 3 (3): 255–287.

Burmark, L. 2002. Visual literacy: Learn to see, see to learn. Alexandria, VA: Association for

Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Debes, John. 1969. The Loom of Visual Literacy. In: Audiovisual Instruction. 14 (8), 1969:

-27.

Diana Dumetz Carry, Visual Literacy: Using Images to Increase Comprehension,

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. (2002). Effective Practices for Developing Reading

Comprehension. International Reading Association

Felten, P. (2008). Visual literacy. Change. Nov./Dec. 2008: 60-63.

Jackie Gerstein. Schools Need to Include More Visual- Based Learning.

Levie, W. H., and R. Lentz. 1982. Effects of text illustrations: A review of research.

Educational Communications and Technology Journal. A Journal of Theory, Research, and

Development, v30 n4 p195-232 Win 1982

MacWhinney, B. 2005. The emergence of grammar from perspective. In Grounding

cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking, ed. D.

Pecher and R. A. Zwaan, 198–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maria Ebner & Derek Bruff. Visual thinking. A preview of "Show and Tell: Visual Thinking

in the Classroom," a workshop at the Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching's January

conference for grad students, GradSTEP 2011.

National Archive. Educators Recourses. Teaching with documents,

Nunan, D. 1999. Second language teaching and learning.

Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon (MCB University

Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001)

Schiller, H. A. (1987). Visual literacy in ancient and modern man (part one). In R. A. Braden,

D. G. Beau- champ, & L.

W. Miller (Eds.). Visible & Viable: The Role of Images in Instruction and Communication.

Commerce: East Texas State University.